The F-Number System is the new American Concrete Institute (# 117) and Canadian Standards Association (# A23.1) standard for the specification and measurement of concrete floor flatness and levelness. F-Numbers replace the familiar “1/8th inch in ten feet” type specs that had proven unreliable, unmeasurable and unrealistic.
The new standards include two F-Numbers: FF for flatness and FL for levelness
Flatness relates to the bumpiness of the floor, while levelness describes the tilt or pitch of the slab. The higher the F-Number, the better that characteristic of the floor.
F-Numbers are linear, so an FF 20 is twice as flat as an FF 10 but only half as flat as an FF 40.
Slabs-on-grade are usually specified with an FF number and an FL number (the FF is always listed first), such as:
FF 25 / FL 20
Because of deflection, elevated slabs are usually specified using only FF.
When a floor is described as an “F 25”, it usually means “FF 25″.
The ACI/CSA F-Number System applies to 99% of all floor slabs – all floors that support random traffic, be it vehicular or pedestrian traffic.
In the tiny percentage of floors that have defined traffic, where vehicles are restricted in their movement by wire or rail guidance, a different F-Number – Fmin – is used. This System is used in conjunction with consultation services provided by The Face Companies.
Most Superflat floors should use the Fmin System, since most of these slabs support defined traffic.
There was disagreement as to what they meant.
Did “1/8th inch in ten feet” mean ± 1/8″ in 10′ (a horizontal 1/4″ envelope which is 10′ long) – or – did it mean ± 1/16″ in 10′ (a horizontal 1/8th inch envelope which is ten feet long)?
Straightedge measurements were unscientific and non-repeatable.
Before F-Numbers, floors were only “measured” long after the fact, when someone didn’t like the floors’ general appearance. That’s when the straightedge was finally hauled out by the aggrieved party in an effort to prove his case. Of course, no two people got the same results, since there was no standard for either the test method or for interpreting the results.
They were unrealistic.
Although “1/8th inch in ten feet” has been used to specify billions of square feet of concrete, it was seldom, if ever, achieved. The typical industrial floor, for example, is closer to a horizontal 5/8th inch by ten-foot envelope.
During the last 15 years, extremely accurate floor measuring instruments have been developed.
One, the Profileograph, produces continuous measurements of wheeltrack areas along designated vehicular travel paths. The Profileograph is used only on Defined Traffic Floors.
Another instrument, the Dipstick Floor Profiler, produces a point-to-point graph of the surface measured, as well as the data required to compute ACI/CSA F-Numbers for Random Traffic Floors.
Straightedge specifications didn’t control the characteristics of the floor that relate to its usefulness.
For instance, all of these floor profiles would satisfy the ‘1/8th inch in ten feet spec’:
Since all these floor profiles would meet the 1/8th” spec, the straightedge specs themselves simply were not capable of controlling the floor profile.
F-Numbers control both the floor’s “envelope” and its bumpiness.
Or, if you think of the floor profile as a wave, F-Numbers control both the wave’s amplitude and its frequency.
F-Numbers have shown the ability to identify and to control floor characteristics which are critical to the floor’s usefulness.
For all of the reasons outlined already, there is no F-Number equivalent to any straightedge spec. But, rough equivalents, in terms of horizontal envelopes, can be given:
An FF 25 is roughly equivalent to a single ± 1/4″ defect in 10′
An FF 50 is roughly equivalent to a single ± 1/8″ defect in 10′
An FF 100 is roughly equivalent to a single ± 1/16″ defect in 10′
Because you weren’t meeting 1/8th inch in 10 feet! Just because the floor was accepted and paid for doesn’t mean it was actually that flat. The only time you can be sure you actually built a floor to a specific tolerance is if the floor was measured.
In all probability, most of the concrete floors placed in the last 50 years would measure somewhere between FF 15 and FF 35; that’s something like horizontal envelopes measuring 1 inch by 10 feet – to 3/8ths inch by 10 feet.
Just hire a testing lab to measure some of your old jobs. If your local test lab doesn’t have a Dipstick, you can rent or purchase one and measure the floors yourself. Then, you will know exactly what F-Numbers you have been able to produce under the particular circumstances of each project you measured.
Using F-Numbers doesn’t mean that floors have to be specified flatter than is needed. But, without F-Numbers, there is no way to measure reliably what floor flatness/levelness was actually produced.
The average industrial floor is about an FF 20 / FL 15. Many building owners are satisfied with this result, but some would find areas of the floor that they would want “fixed”.
What happens if the floor profile is not specified at all, and an FF 12 / FL 8 is produced? Most owners are not going to be happy with this result.
But without clearly defining what is and is not satisfactory in the floor specification, the developer of the building has no control whatsoever over what he is buying.
F-Numbers were not invented as a way to find somebody to blame. Properly used, F-Numbers identify problems and help prevent their recurrence.
After gaining experience with F-Numbers, a contractor can select placement and finishing procedures which will make a failure very unlikely.
F-Number measurements should be taken as soon as each day’s placement will bear foot traffic. In most cases, the F-Numbers for that slab can be determined within an hour or two and a report generated before the next slab is placed.
With daily measurement, a construction problem can be identified and corrected before it’s repeated.
Placing floors to achieve certain F-Numbers is not guesswork.
Millions and millions of square feet of concrete have been placed using the F- Number System. Concrete contractors have learned that, by using certain placement and finishing techniques, they can routinely achieve different F-Numbers (see Measuring the Quality of Floor Finishes).
Therefore, if a job is specified FF 25 / FL 20, a contractor should use procedures which typically produce those F- Numbers or, to play it safe, methods which produce marginally higher F-Numbers.
So, the keys to meeting F-Numbers specs are:
- Choose the correct placement and finishing procedures to meet the specified F- Numbers.
- Measure each day’s work as soon as possible so, if there’s a problem, it will be identified before it’s repeated.
There are two ways to select the proper F-Numbers for a given floor usage.
The first and the best way is to identify a floor in a building that the user is already happy with. The F-Numbers for this floor can then be measured and used to develop a new floor specification.
If that’s not practical, you can use F-Numbers suggested by the American Concrete Institute and others, which are based on hundreds of projects around the country.
F-Numbers are derived from a statistical analysis of the floor’s elevation measured at one-foot intervals. The elevation differences over two feet are used to determine FF , while the differences over ten feet are used to determine FL.
Basically, measurement lines are laid out on the floor, and elevation measurements are taken every one foot down the line. Each measurement line should be at least 11 feet long, and at least 34 individual elevation measurements should be taken for each 1,000 square feet of floor area. Detailed rules for performing F-Number tests are set forth in ASTM E 1155.
After collection, the elevation readings are put into standard mathematical formulae to calculate the floor’s F-Numbers. Several devices are approved by ASTM for F-Number measurement, including the Dipstick Floor Profiler.
A single operator with a Dipstick can collect enough readings in 60 to 90 minutes to measure the typical day’s slab-on-grade placement. With the Dipstick 2000, the data can then be analyzed right on the Dipstick and a report can be printed directly from the printer supplied with the Dipstick kit. Alternatively, the data may be downloaded to a PC at your office for analysis later.
This is a question that must be answered before the construction of the floor begins. The “what-if’s” should always be addressed in the floor specification. Each floor should be specified using two pairs of F-Numbers called:
- Specified Overall F-Numbers
- Minimum Local F-Numbers.
The Specified Overall F-Numbers represent the minimum values allowed for the entire floor, looked at as a whole.
The Minimum Local F-Numbers define the minimum quality acceptable to the Owner — the lowest results allowed in any one floor section. These numbers are generally set 30% to 50% lower than the Specified Overall Numbers. This allows contractors sufficient margin for the normal variations that occur with a given construction method. However, no floor should be spec’ed with Minimum Local values lower than FF 13 / FL 10; this is the worst result to be tolerated from any construction technique.
The idea is that if the Contractor aims above the Overall F-Numbers, he will, at least, average those Overall values — and it is very unlikely that he will fail to achieve the Minimum Local F-Numbers.
As we’ve pointed out, the Minimum Local F-Numbers give the Contractor very considerable room for error, but if he does miss even these lower numbers, he has only two choices:
- Repair (this almost always means re-topping) all defective sections.
- Remove and replace all defective sections.
But, don’t worry too much about ripping out slabs right and left. If the proper procedures are used, the chances of failing to meet Minimum Local F- Numbers on a project are almost zero.
Because F-Numbers are a statistical measurement, localized grinding usually doesn’t work on Random Traffic Floors. If the grinding removes what looks like a “bump” in one direction, the grinding might be creating a “dip” when the floor is measured in another direction.
Unless there is a very obvious local defect, grinding is not a solution.
Because the specification has already defined the Minimum Local F-Numbers as “acceptable”, no corrections are mandated by failing to satisfy the Specified Overall F-Numbers.
But clearly, the floor produced was not the floor specified. The Face Companies’ recommended solution is a rebate formula. The floor specification should include a per-square-foot figure for the number of square feet that does not meet the Specified Overall F-Numbers.
The software which comes with every model of the Dipstick automatically calculates the floor area equal to spec, the floor area better than spec, and the floor area worse than the spec.
The Dipstick offers the fastest, easiest and most economical way to monitor F-Number projects, but, in most cases, purchase of a Dipstick in order to measure one project is neither necessary nor advisable.
Many testing labs already have Dipsticks and offer F-Number measurement as part of their overall quality control services.
Dipsticks are also available for rent – by the week or the month.
People who have never run a Dipstick should receive one or two days of training in the operation of the instrument and in F-Number measurement procedures.
This training and Dipstick certification are offered by The Face Companies.
Official ACI, CSA and ASTM documents should always be kept available for quick reference on job site.
The ACI mandates F-Number measurement within 72 hours of slab installation (this would allow a Friday pour to be measured on Monday). On most projects, daily testing is best.
A significant delay between placement and measurement can allow shrinkage or deflection phenomena (such as curling) to affect the results. One of the objectives of timely measurement is to establish clearly whether the Contractor did or did not do his job so that the cause and remedy of any problems found can be easily determined.
There are many factors which influence F-Number results, but there is a simple way to look at it:
FL= forming & strike-off
The quickest, easiest and least expensive way to improve flatness (FF) is to replace the bullfloat with a highway straightedge. At no extra cost, this simple equipment substitution alone can result in an increase of 25% to 50% in the resulting FF numbers.
By increasing the number of highway straightedging operations during the finishing process (after floating, refloating, etc.), higher and higher FF numbers can be achieved. The distance between edge forms may have to be reduced below 25 feet to achieve FF numbers above 40.
The accuracy in setting forms and the accuracy of the strike-off operation have the greatest impact on levelness (FL).
Because of the increased number and intensity of operations, more labor is generally required to achieve higher and higher F-Numbers.
While its cosmetic importance is obvious, slab flatness/levelness also has a major impact on the ease, efficiency, and cost of finishing out tenant spaces. The construction and installation of door frames, movable partitions, pre-fabricated cabinetry and elevator landings are impacted by the flatness and levelness of the floor slabs.
In most cases, only the FF number is specified on elevated slabs. That’s because elevated slabs deflect – and the contractor can’t totally control how much deflection occurs.
The use of FL on elevated slabs is limited to specific situations where the floor profile is analyzed when :
- the slab is still supported in its original as-cast position; and
- the slab has no camber.
An Overall FF 25 is well received by most Owners and can be achieved without significant cost burden.The Face Companies recommend that no elevated slab should be specified lower than Overall FF 20.
The right FF for each job will depend on the use of the floor. For instance, a floor that will be tiled should be flatter than a floor that will be carpeted.
Although F-Numbers aren’t the answer for controlling deflection, the Dipstick can be used to produce floor profiles before and after shore removal. By studying the amount of deflection which occurs, design and construction procedures can be modified until optimum results are achieved.
The Face Companies recommend that the elevated slab specification requires that a certain percentage of the elevation points measured using ASTM procedures after deflection has occurred fall within a defined envelope.
Based on Face Companies research, most Owners are happy with the result if 80% of the sample falls within a 3/4 inch envelope.
During measurement and data analysis, each measurement line is tied to a design elevation to make this analysis possible.
In order to perform the deflection analysis unique to elevated slabs, extra care is taken to identify each measurement line before readings are taken.
This means that elevated slabs take a little more time to measure.
Generally, 20,000 to 25,000 sq. ft. of elevated slabs can be measured in two to two and a half hours.
The most common repair method is patching (or “skim-coating”). Floor locations identified by Dipstick survey as needing repair may be as small as an area bounded by column lines and half-column lines.
Suspect areas identified by the initial ASTM E 1155 measurement are usually re-measured in more detail to establish the boundaries of the repair.
By definition, Superflat = Fmin 100
The word Superflat was first used by The Face Companies in the 1970’s to describe the flatness/levelness required to support full-speed, trouble-free operation of Very Narrow Aisle (VNA) lift trucks.
Since Fmin is the Defined Traffic F-Number, it cannot be measured using the ACI/CSA/ASTM F-Number System.
In order to achieve this high degree of flatness/levelness, Superflat floors must be placed in long, narrow strips. The forms for Superflat placements must be set with great precision. Specialized finishing techniques and continuous quality control measurement are also required. The services of a floor design/construction consultant are usually advisable.
For Random Traffic Floors, Superflat is often defined as FF 100/FL 50; but Superflat tolerances are rarely required on Random Traffic Floors and should be specified only in extraordinary circumstances.
Floor consultants from The Face Companies measure Fmin using the Profileograph, in conjunction with their overall design, construction and certification services.
For Random Traffic Floors, F-Numbers can be measured using the Dipstick Floor Profiler – but, again, the Dipstick should never be used to measure narrow aisle warehouse floors or any Defined Traffic Floor.
A Defined Traffic Floor (such as a narrow aisle warehouse) supports traffic which moves along the exact same tracks all the time.
This means that the travel paths can be measured using an instrument that precisely simulates the behavior of the vehicles which will be used on the floor. This kind of vehicle simulator (such as the Face Floor Profileograph) is configured to mimic the wheel pattern of the actual lift truck to be used. The instrument rolls down the vehicle travel paths and records the relative motion of its wheels, side to side and front to front.
With this kind of continuous simulation measurement, local defects (bumps or dips) in the tracks can be identified and corrected by localized grinding.
In contrast, ACI/CSA/ASTM F-Numbers (Random Traffic F-Numbers) are not measured from a continuous profile. The one-foot measurements do not simulate what the lift truck “sees” and cannot, therefore, be used to identify and repair specific wheel track defects.
The cost of making a floor Superflat varies significantly from one region of the country to another. The premium on smaller projects (25,000 sq. ft. and under) is especially difficult to generalize.
But on average, turning a conventional floor into a Superflat floor all other things being equal will likely increase the floor’s cost between $ 0.90 and $ 1.50 per square foot.
Most of the extra costs are related to the additional labor required for special forming and finishing procedures, and the reduced production rates achieved (4,000 to 6,000 sq.ft./day per crew on the average).
If there is a spot that is too low in a Superflat Defined Traffic wheelpath, grinding can be used to smooth out the dip lengthwise down the track — and to lower the elevation of the opposite wheeltrack to level the location.
Yes. Design slope can be compensated for in Superflat measurements.
It’s important to remember that the floor profile characteristics that are critical to efficient, full-speed vehicle operation are the flatness/levelness characteristics under the wheels of the vehicle.
In most cases, the truck really doesn’t care if one end of the aisle is higher or lower than the other. It only cares how many bumps and dips it encounters in getting from one end to the other.
This is not a good idea in most cases.
Remember, Superflat floors are placed in long, narrow strips. The strips are arranged to conform to the racking layout for the warehouse. The long edges of each strip are positioned so they will end up in the middle of adjacent racking sections. The aisleway and the travel path are located down the middle of each strip.
Since forming the aisleway separately would require twice as much forming and twice as many slab placements, this approach is usually not practical – nor does it produce significantly better F-Numbers.
The floor specification should include a per-square-foot figure for the portion of the floor that does not meet the Overall F-Numbers.
No one has figured out a way to build a Superflat joint, so building a floor that’s Superflat in all directions is not yet possible.
Using the best installation technologies available, the practical limit in as-built omni-directional flatness/levelness is about FFL 35.
There are two alternatives:
- Superflat topping
- Superflat grinding
Both options require specialized knowledge, both in planning and executing the repair.
The services of a floor consultant experienced in topping and grinding repairs should be retained early in the decision-making process.
Literature on floor flatness/levelness is available free from The Face Companies.
In addition to official ACI and ASTM documents, The Face Companies can provide detailed information on the design, specification, construction and quality control measurement of concrete floor slabs.
Compliments of The Face Companies